When Did We Stop Letting Kids Be Bored?
- 23 hours ago
- 3 min read
Somewhere along the way, boredom became something we decided children shouldn’t experience.
There’s a wait at the doctor’s office? Hand them a screen.
The food hasn’t arrived yet? Find a video.
We’re driving somewhere? Put on a movie.
There’s nothing planned for Saturday afternoon?
Quick. Find something for them to do.
We have become incredibly good at filling every empty space in children’s lives.
But I wonder if, in trying to keep children constantly entertained, we’ve accidentally taken something valuable away from them.
“I’m Bored” Isn’t an Emergency
I remember when being bored meant figuring something out.
You went outside.
You drew something.
You made up a game with rules that made absolutely no sense.
You reorganized something that didn’t need reorganizing.
You bothered your sibling.
You stared at the ceiling long enough for your imagination to eventually take over.
Was every minute productive? Of course not.
That was the point.
There wasn’t always an adult standing nearby with an activity, lesson, device, or carefully curated experience ready to fill the silence.
Sometimes there was simply nothing to do.
So we found something.
We’ve Made Entertainment Instant
Children today have access to something previous generations never had: essentially unlimited entertainment on demand.
There is always another video.
Another game.
Another episode.
Another notification.
Another swipe.
Another thing designed specifically to capture attention before boredom has a chance to arrive.
And technology itself isn’t the villain here. Screens can be educational, creative, social, and genuinely useful.
The bigger question is whether we’ve become so uncomfortable with children having nothing to do that we’ve stopped allowing them to discover what happens after boredom.

Because something interesting happens there.
Boredom Makes Children Come Up With Their Own Answers
Give a child a toy, and they’ll play with the toy.
Give a child a cardboard box, and suddenly it’s a spaceship.
Or a restaurant.
Or a house.
Or a race car.
Or something with an elaborate name, three floors, seventeen imaginary residents, and rules you’re apparently expected to understand even though nobody explained them to you.
That’s childhood creativity in action.
When entertainment isn’t immediately provided, children have to generate something themselves.
They experiment.
They pretend.
They build.
They investigate.
They make decisions.
They solve tiny problems.
Most importantly, they learn that they are capable of creating their own experience instead of waiting for someone else to create one for them.
Not Every Moment Needs to Be Educational Either
This might be the part adults struggle with most.
We love turning things into lessons.
If they’re cooking, let’s teach fractions.
If they’re outside, let’s identify plants.
If they’re drawing, let’s find an instructional video.
If they’re building something, let’s turn it into STEM.
Those things can be wonderful.
But sometimes a child can just make a terrible-looking cookie.
Sometimes they can draw a purple dog with six legs without anyone asking what developmental skill the activity supports.
Sometimes digging a hole is just digging a hole.
Childhood doesn’t need a learning objective attached to every experience.
Children are learning anyway.
And Yes, They’re Going to Complain
Let’s be realistic.
If you tell a child who is accustomed to immediate entertainment to “go find something to do,” there is a very good chance they will not suddenly thank you for supporting their creativity.
You’re probably going to hear:
“But there’s nothing to do.”
“I don’t know what to do.”
“This is boring.”
Possibly several times.
That’s okay.
We don’t necessarily have to solve it.
That’s the uncomfortable part.
Sometimes adults need to resist becoming the entertainment director.
Because if we immediately provide the solution every time a child experiences boredom, they never get far enough into boredom to discover their own.
Children Need Unstructured Time
Our kids’ lives can become remarkably scheduled.
School.
Homework.
Sports.
Tutoring.
Clubs.
Lessons.
Activities.
Appointments.
Family obligations.
Then screens fill whatever gaps remain.
There can be very little time when nobody is asking them to accomplish something.
Unstructured time gives children room to follow an idea simply because it interests them.
No grade.
No trophy.
No adult applause required.
Just:
“I wonder what happens if I try this.”
That kind of exploration matters.
Maybe Boredom Isn’t the Problem
Maybe our discomfort with boredom is.
We don’t have to eliminate technology.
We don’t have to recreate childhood exactly as it existed twenty or thirty years ago.
And we certainly don’t need to make children miserable in the name of building character.
But perhaps we can stop treating every quiet moment like an empty space that needs to be filled.
Let them sit.
Let them wander around the house dramatically announcing that there is absolutely nothing to do.
Let them complain a little.
Let them figure something out.
Because somewhere between “I’m bored” and “Look what I made,” something important happens.
A child discovers that their imagination can entertain them.
And that’s something no algorithm can provide.




Comments